A recent study in Ophthalmology1 has tabulated what we already know: Cataract surgery is a great deal for society by both financial and quality-of-life measures—and the deal has gotten better (well, cheaper, from society’s point of view). Using inflation-adjusted dollars, the direct medical cost for cataract surgery (surgeon plus facility) has decreased 34% from 2000 to 2012. From 1985 to the present, it has fallen 85%. With regard to the inflation-adjusted physician fee, it is an astounding 10.1% of what it was in 1985. Richard Lindstrom2 has been telling us about this “cataracts-per-Cadillac” ratio for years, and looming Medicare budget cuts and/or freezes threaten to skew this figure further.
The third-party payer budget squeeze has affected all physicians, especially primary care practices. As a result, during the past decade, we’ve seen a secondary “concierge medicine” market emerge. By charging patients a monthly retainer, ranging from $20 to $10,000 or more, on top of insurance coverage, these concierge practices offer extra levels of service to their patients—be it same-day appointments, email consults, 24-hour direct doctor cell phone access, longer office visits, house calls, etc. The crux and success of this model lies in charging patients directly (on top of their insurance coverage) but only for special, noninsurance-covered services. Sound familiar to cataract surgeons?
In ophthalmology, we’ve been fortunate to have our own version of a patient-pay marketplace around insurance-covered cataract surgery. Premium cataract surgery is really a “concierge cataract” secondary market that has become more mainstream with the advent of advanced-technology IOLs and the femtosecond laser. I foresee a dramatic broadening of these concierge cataract markets. This will allow successful practices to differentiate themselves in the marketplace, to provide more premium services, and to favorably increase their net revenue per cataract.
Looking at my colleagues’ practices, I find that the majority of concierge cataract benefits fall into three broad categories: (1) diagnostic screening, (2) refractive outcome, and (3) enhanced VIP benefits.
The refractive outcome category is the most common and involves the use of premium IOLs, arcuate incisions (manual and femtosecond laser), intraoperative aberrometry, and femtosecond imaging to achieve a specific refractive target. Within this envelope also exist excimer laser discounts or credits for touchups and monovision. Most practices have two pricing tiers: a higher-priced distance/near vision package and a middle-ground astigmatism/distance vision package. But more and more practices are offering even lower-priced offerings for their monofocal patients, such as diagnostic screenings.
With diagnostic packages, the surgeon charges a modest fee for a panel of screening tests not covered by insurance for routine cataract workup. The most common three include corneal topography (or tomography/wavefront), macular OCT imaging, and endothelial cell counts. Undoubtedly, these tests are beneficial in planning and counseling for every cataract surgery patient, not just the advanced-technology IOL patients. And many screening tests can be added here, such as tear film interferometry.
Finally, there is a growing category of enhanced VIP service benefits that surgeons are including in their top-tier refractive packages to further incentivize patient upgrades. For example, there is an area practice that gives its top-tier cataract package patients a shiny plastic concierge card that affords them special privileges such as direct anytime contact with a personal refractive liaison and a bypass-the-waiting-room pass during all postoperative appointments. Yes, this sounds like a premium rental car benefit, but it also sounds like a winning patient engagement strategy that will grow the practice in revenue and referrals.
In my practice, I offer many (but not all) of these concierge offerings and am looking to expand. A concierge cataract practice allows surgeons to offer market-priced services, which are transparent to the patient and do not further burden the health care system.
Disclaimer: Not all models described herein have been vetted by regulatory or legal experts. Practices should seek expert consultation before instituting any such fee structures to ensure that they are compliant.
1. Brown GC, Brown MM, Menezes A, et al. Cataract surgery cost utility revisited in 2012: a new economic paradigm. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(12):2367-2376.
2. Lindstrom R. Veteran perspective: learning to thrive in an inclement healthcare climate. Eyeworld. February 2008.